- Journal List
- Bio Protoc
- v.14(3); 2024 Feb 5
- PMC10875356
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
Bio Protoc. 2024 Feb 5; 14(3): e4933.
Published online 2024 Feb 5. doi:10.21769/BioProtoc.4933
PMCID: PMC10875356
PMID: 38379826
Marie Piecyk,1 Joëlle Fauvre,1 Cédric Duret,1 Cédric Chaveroux,1,* and Carole Ferraro-Peyret1,2,*
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
See "The stress sensor GCN2 differentially controls ribosome biogenesis in colon cancer according to the nutritional context." in Mol Oncol, 37452637.
Abstract
As the most energy- and metabolite-consuming process, protein synthesis is underthe control of several intrinsic and extrinsic factors that determine itsfine-tuning to the cellular microenvironment. Consequently, variations inprotein synthesis rates occur under various physiological and pathologicalconditions, enabling an adaptive response by the cell. For example, globalprotein synthesis increases upon mitogenic factors to support biomass generationand cell proliferation, while exposure to low concentrations of oxygen ornutrients require translational repression and reprogramming to avoid energydepletion and cell death. To assess fluctuations in protein synthesis rates,radioactive isotopes or radiolabeled amino acids are often used. Although highlysensitive, these techniques involve the use of potentially toxic radioactivecompounds and require specific materials and processes for the use and disposalof these molecules. The development of alternative, non-radioactive methods thatcan be easily and safely implemented in laboratories has therefore beenencouraged to avoid handling radioactivity. In this context, the SUrface SEnsingof Translation (SUnSET) method, based on the classical western blot technique,was developed by Schmidt et al. in 2009. The SUnSET is nowadays recognized as asimple alternative to radioactive methods assessing protein synthesis rates.
Key features
• As a structural analogue of aminoacyl-transfer RNA, puromycin incorporates intothe elongating peptide chain.
• Detection of puromycin-labeled peptides by western blotting reflects translationrates without the need for radioactive isotopes.
• The protocol described here for in vitro applications is derived from the SUnSETmethod originally published by Schmidt et al. (2009).
Keywords: SUnSET, Protein synthesis, Translation rates, Puromycin, Alternative to radioactivity
Background
As a structural analogue of aminoacyl-tRNA, the aminonucleoside antibiotic puromycinis incorporated through non-hydrolysable peptide bounding into the growing peptidechain along the elongation process (Nathans, 1964).While high concentrations block the elongation phase and hence translation, at lowdoses the overall translation rate of protein synthesis remains unchanged.Consequently, the rate of formation of puromycin-labeled peptides mirrors the rateof protein translation. Taking advantage of this property, 3H-puromycin labeling wasfirst used in 1979 to assess the rate of protein synthesis in various tissues invivo under nutrient- and protein-poor diets (Nakanoand Hara, 1979). The SUnSET (SUrface SEnsing of Translation) technique wasdeveloped 30 years later by Schmidt and colleagues to detect variations in proteinsynthesis rates in cultured cells by western blotting (Schmidt et al., 2009). This method was then coupled with othertechniques (fluorescence-activated cell sorting or immunohistochemistry) to assessprotein synthesis at different scales. Further developments, notably based on theClik-it technology combined with O-propargyl puromycin (OP-Puro), a puromycinanalogue, enable visualization of puromycilated proteins and assessment ofelongation rates in tissues (Morral et al., 2020).The main advantage of using puromycin and its analogues is that it does not requireradioactive isotopes such as 35S-methionine, historically used to measure proteinsynthesis rates, with comparable analytical performance (Schmidt et al., 2009). Because proteostasis defects areassociated with a variety of chronic diseases (cancer, tissue fibrosis, inflammatorysyndromes, etc.) or aging, it is necessary to monitor the changes in proteinsynthesis rates in response to a variety of stressors in order to better understandthe translational reprogramming underlying cell adaptation. The following protocoldescribes a SUnSET method (Figure1) suitable for assessing protein synthesis rates in lysates from cells grownin vitro by conventional western blot analysis.
Figure 1.
Principle of the SUnSET assay.
During the elongation step, addition of puromycin leads to its incorporationinto the A site of the ribosome. The transfer and linkage of the polypeptideto the puromycin cause the termination of translation releasingpuromycilated proteins that can subsequently be detected by western blottingagainst the puromycin.
Materials and reagents
Biological materials
Cell lines of interest obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Inthis study, we used the colon cancer cell line HCT116.
Reagents
Puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: P9620)
PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: D1408)
Complete anti-protease (Roche, catalog number: 11836145001)
Dry milk (Régilait, catalog number: 304934416704)
Bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Roche, catalog number: 10735094001)
DC Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad, catalog number: 5000111)
Prestained protein ladder (Euromedex, catalog number: 06P-0111)
Immobilion Forte western substrate (Merck Millipore, catalog number:WBLUF0500)
Ponceau red solution (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog number: 141194)
Mouse anti-puromycin antibody (clone 12D10) (Merck Millipore, catalog number:MABE343)
Mouse anti-tubulin antibody (clone DM1A) (Sigma, catalog number: T6199)
HRP-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology,catalog number: 7076)
Stripping buffer (Thermo Scientific, catalog number: 21059)
Solutions
RIPA protein lysis buffer 2× (see Recipes)
Tris-buffered saline-Tween (TBS-T) (see Recipes)
TBS-T 5% BSA (see Recipes)
TBS-T 5% dry milk (see Recipes)
Laemmli 6× (see Recipes)
Recipes
RIPA protein lysis buffer 2×
Reagent Finalconcentration Tris-HClpH 7.2 100mM NaCl 300mM EDTA 10mM Sodiumdeoxycholate 2% SDS20% 0.1% Triton100× 2× Na3VO4 4mM βglycerophosphate 20mM NaF 20mM Completeanti-protease 2× Open in a separate window
Dilute to 1× in H2O.
Tris-buffered saline-Tween (TBS-T)
Reagent Finalconcentration Tris-HClpH 7.5 50mM NaCl
Tween
150 mM
0.1%
Open in a separate window
Add 5% of BSA or dry milk for obtaining TBS-T 5% BSA or 5% dry milk,respectively.
Laemmli 6×
Reagent Finalconcentration Tris-HClpH 6.8 0.5M Glycerol 1% SDS20% 2% DTT 0.6M Bromophenolblue 0.4% Open in a separate window
Laboratory supplies
6-well or 10 cm diameter tissue culture plates
Sterile scrapers
Microcentrifuge tubes
Plastic wrap
Equipment
Tissue culture apparatus (tissue culture hood, CO2 incubator,etc.)
Pipettes and micropipettes
Vacuum pump
Centrifuge (4 °C)
Cold room
Heat block
Western blotting apparatus (SDS-PAGE running cassette, power supply, shaker,transfer cassette, nitrocellulose membrane, etc.)
ChemiDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad, catalog number: 12003153)
Software and datasets
Fiji (National Institutes of Health)
Procedure
Puromycin incorporation in vitro
Seed HTC116 cells one day before the experiment and maintain at 37°C and 5% CO2 to allow attachment to the tissueculture plate. In the experiment presented in Figure 2, 200,000 cellsper well were seeded in a 6-well plate.
Open in a separate windowFigure 2.
SUnSET assay demonstrating a repression of proteinsynthesis upon treatment with GCN2 kinase inhibitor.
HCT116 cells were treated or not for 24 h with a GCN2kinase inhibitor (GCN2i also named TAP20) and exposed topuromycin (5 μg/mL) 15 min before protein extraction.Protein translation rates were assessed by western blotanalysis using an anti-puromycin antibody (Puro).Tubulin is presented here as a loading control. Thecorresponding molecular weights are indicated on theright of the western blots. Results extracted fromPiecyk et al. (2023). Quantification of the data on theleft represents the mean ± SEM (n = 3). Unpairedtwo-tailed t-test with p-value (** p < 0.01).
On the day of the experiment, apply the studied treatment on cellsfor the desired time.
Before harvesting and 15 min before the end of the treatment, exposecells to 5 μg/mL puromycin directly diluted in the media. Allsamples must be incubated with the same concentration of puromycinfor an equal period.
Protein extracts
At the end of the 15-min incubation with puromycin, remove media andrinse cells once with cold PBS.
Put the tissue culture plate on ice and incubate with 1× RIPAprotein lysis buffer (see Recipes) containing proteases andphosphatases inhibitors (1 volume of 1× RIPA for 1 volume ofcell pellet) for 20 min.
Scrape the cells and collect in a microcentrifuge tube.
Centrifuge at 13,000× g for 20 min at 4 °Cto get rid of cellular debris.
Collect the supernatant in a new microcentrifuge tube and add theappropriate volume of Laemmli 6× (see Recipes).
Dose the amounts of extracted proteins using the DC Protein Assay kitaccording to manufacturer’s instructions.
Add the appropriate volume of Laemmli 1× to normalize proteinconcentrations in all samples and denaturate by heating at 95 °Cfor 5 min.
Western blotting
Load 20 μg of proteins for all studied conditions on a 10%SDS-PAGE gel. We recommend adding 5 μL of protein ladder toestimate the molecular weight of visualized proteins.
When separated, transfer proteins onto nitrocellulose membranes as astandard western blot protocol. Stain with Ponceau red solution tocheck equal protein amount loading before electrophoresis.
Block the membrane with TBS-T 5% dry milk for 1 h at room temperaturewith gentle shaking.
Wash with TBS-T for 5 min on a shaker and repeat the operation twotimes.
Incubate overnight at 4 °C on a gentle shaker with puromycinantibody diluted at 1/10,000 into TBS-T 5% BSA.
Wash with TBS-T for 5 min on a shaker and repeat the operation twotimes.
Incubate at room temperature for 1 h with the HRP-conjugatedanti-mouse secondary antibody (1/10,000 dilution) into TBS-T 5% drymilk.
Wash with TBS-T for 5 min on a shaker and repeat the operation twotimes.
Gently dry the membrane using paper towels and place it face up andflat on a sheet of plastic wrap.
Directly add the Immobilion Forte western substrate onto the wholemembrane.
Detect chemiluminescence with the ChemiDoc imaging system (Figure 2).Intensity of the smear depends on cell ability to incorporatepuromycin and is thus representative of protein synthesis rate.
Rinse the membrane in TBS-T and transfer in 5 mL of stripping buffer.
Protect from the light and put on thorough agitation for 15 min.Check that all bound antibodies have been detached by verifying thatno chemiluminescent signal is detected on the ChemiDoc imagingsystem.
Block the membrane with TBS-T 5% dry milk for 30 min at roomtemperature on gentle shaking.
Incubate at room temperature for 1 h with the anti-tubulin antibodydiluted into TBS-T 5% dry milk.
Wash with TBS-T for 5 min on a shaker and repeat the operation twotimes.
Incubate at room temperature for 1 h with the HRP-conjugatedanti-mouse secondary antibody (1/10,000 dilution) into TBS-T 5% drymilk.
Wash with TBS-T for 5 minutes on a shaker and repeat the operationtwo times.
Gently dry the membrane using paper towels and place it face up andflat on a sheet of plastic wrap.
Directly add 1 mL of the Immobilion Forte western substrate in orderto cover the whole membrane.
Detect chemiluminescence with the ChemiDoc imaging system (Figure 2).Intensity of the bands is proportional to protein loading beforeelectrophoresis.
Quantification of the puromycin and tubulin signals can be performedusing the Fiji software (refer to Data analysis section).
Data analysis
Open the Fiji software.
Click on the File menu to seek for the ChemiDoc images ofthe SUnSET experiment.
Use the Rectangular tool to graph a frame around the first smear to quantifyand define the region of interest.
In the Analyze menu, select Gels and SelectFirst Lane.
Move the section to the next lane and select Gels and SelectNext Lane in the Analyze menu.
Repeat the operation for each lane.
Select Plot Lanes in the Analyze/Gels menuto create each lane profile plot.
Define a closed area for each lane plot using the Straight LineSelection Tool to draw a baseline for each peak.
Measure each peak area clicking inside with the Wand tool.
Report area measurements in a Results sheet.
Repeat this process for tubulin signal quantification.
Normalize: for each lane, calculate the ratio SUnSET area/Tubulin area.
Compare the ratio observed in each lane to assess the impact of studiedconditions on protein synthesis rate.
Validation of protocol
This protocol was adapted from the original article: Schmidt et al. (2009). TheSUnSET method was performed and validated for in vitro applications in severalarticles from Dr. Chaveroux’s group (Sarcinelli et al., 2020; Piecyk et al.,2021 and 2023) and other teams in the literature (e.g., Martineau et al., 2014;Mesclon et al., 2017; Arioka et al., 2020; Fong et al., 2021). The SUnSET principlehas been adapted for in vivo and ex vivo applications (Goodman et al., 2011; Morral etal., 2020) and at the single-cell level coupled to flow cytometry for energymetabolism assessment by Dr. Pierre’s group (Argüelloet al., 2020).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Cancéropôle CLARA (CVPPRCAN000174,CVPPRCAB000180 and CV-2021-039), Region Auvergne Rhone-Alpes (19-010898-01),Institut National Du Cancer (PLBIO22-227), Projets Fondation and Aide doctorale(R16173CC, ARCMD-Doc22021020003295) from ARC, Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer(R17167CC, R19007CC), Institut Convergence François Rabelais(17IA66ANR-PLASCAN-MEHLEN), and the IPR (Innovation Pharmaceutique et Recherche)program. Figure 1 wascreated with BioRender.com. This protocol was adapted from the original article:Schmidt et al., 2009.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Citation
Readers should cite both the Bio-protocol article and the originalresearch article where this protocol was used.
Q&A
Post your question about this protocol in Q&Aand get help from the authors of the protocol and some of its users.
References
1. Argüello R. J., Combes A. J., Char R., Gigan J.-P., Baaziz A. I., Bousiquot E., Camosseto V., Samad B., Tsui J., Yan P., et al..(2020). SCENITH: A Flow Cytometry-Based Method toFunctionally Profile Energy Metabolism with Single-Cell Resolution. Cell Metab. 32(6): 1063–1075..e7. 10.1016/j.cmet.2020.11.007 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Arioka Y., Shishido E., Kushima I., Suzuki T., Saito R., Aiba A., Mori D. and Ozaki N.(2020). Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion causesPERK-dependent vulnerability in dopaminergic neurons. EBioMedicine63: 103138. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.103138 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Fong M. Y., Yan W., Ghassemian M., Wu X., Zhou X., Cao M., Jiang L., Wang J., Liu X., Zhang J., et al..(2021). Cancer‐secreted miRNAs regulateamino‐acid‐induced mTORC1 signaling and fibroblast protein synthesis. EMBO Rep. 22(2): e51239. 10.15252/embr.202051239 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Goodman C. A., Mabrey D. M., Frey J. W., Miu M. H., Schmidt E. K., Pierre P. and Hornberger T. A.(2011). Novel insights into the regulation ofskeletal muscle protein synthesis as revealed by a new nonradioactive in vivotechnique. FASEB J. 25(3): 1028–1039.. 10.1096/fj.10-168799 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Martineau Y., Azar R., Müller D., Lasfargues C., El Khawand S., Anesia R., Pelletier J., Bousquet C. and Pyronnet S.(2014). Pancreatic tumours escape from translationalcontrol through 4E-BP1 loss. Oncogene33(11):Article 11. 10.1038/onc.2013.100 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Mesclon F., Lambert-Langlais S., Carraro V., Parry L., Hainault I., Jousse C., Maurin A.-C., Bruhat A., Fafournoux P. and Averous J.(2017). Decreased ATF4 expression as a mechanism ofacquired resistance to long-term amino acid limitation in cancer cells. Oncotarget8(16): 27440–27453.. 10.18632/oncotarget.15828 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Morral C., Stanisavljevic J., Hernando-Momblona X., Mereu E., Àlvarez-Varela A., Cortina C., Stork D., Slebe F., Turon G., Whissell G., et al..(2020). Zonation of Ribosomal DNA TranscriptionDefines a Stem Cell Hierarchy in Colorectal Cancer. CellStem Cell26(6): 845–861..e12. 10.1016/j.stem.2020.04.012 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Nakano K. and Hara H.(1979). Measurement of the protein-syntheticactivity in vivo of various tissues in rats byusing[3H]Puromycin. Biochem. J. 184(3): 663–668.. 10.1042/bj1840663 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Nathans D.(1964). PUROMYCIN INHIBITION OF PROTEIN SYNTHESIS:INCORPORATION OF PUROMYCIN INTO PEPTIDE CHAINS. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 51(4): 585–592.. 10.1073/pnas.51.4.585 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Piecyk M., Triki M., Laval P.-A., Dragic H., Cussonneau L., Fauvre J., Duret C., Aznar N., Renno T., Manié S. N., et al..(2021). Pemetrexed Hinders Translation Inhibitionupon Low Glucose in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Metabolites11(4): 198. 10.3390/metabo11040198 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Piecyk M., Triki M., Laval P.-A., Duret C., Fauvre J., Cussonneau L., Machon C., Guitton J., Rama N., Gibert B., et al..(2023). The stress sensor GCN2 differentiallycontrols ribosome biogenesis in colon cancer according to the nutritionalcontext. Mol. Oncol. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/1878-0261.13491 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Sarcinelli C., Dragic H., Piecyk M., Barbet V., Duret C., Barthelaix A., Ferraro-Peyret C., Fauvre J., Renno T., Chaveroux C., et al..(2020). ATF4-Dependent NRF2 TranscriptionalRegulation Promotes Antioxidant Protection during Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress. Cancers(Basel)12(3): 569. 10.3390/cancers12030569 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Schmidt E. K., Clavarino G., Ceppi M. and Pierre P.(2009). SUnSET, a nonradioactive method to monitorprotein synthesis. Nat. Methods 6(4): Article4. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nmeth.1314 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Bio-protocol are provided here courtesy of Bio-protocol, LLC